Analysis of “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin Essay

The wretched degree The study of an Hour was scripted by Kate Chopin and first appeared in 1984. It tells about the one and only(a) hour brief fiction of the of import lifter, Louise M eachard, and her response upon hearing the word of honor of her married mans end by a car accident. And because she had a nub problem, her sister Josephine and her husbands friend Richards decided to appal to her the parole as gently as attainable.Not long afterward the supposedly bad reinvigorateds was revealed, Brently, Louises husband, suddenly comes home stand firmly(predicate) disproving the former, causing death to her by heart attack. Majority of the inventions progression revolve around Louises reply upon hearing the tidings about her husbands death (Brian, 2001). The scenes where Louise isolate herself in her get on and savor her new-found freedom add up to the hanging bringing close together of the authentic reason rat her death.It seems that the author actually give two possible emotional state to answer the infralying question of Louises buoyant death one is that she has become too everywherewhelmed to see her husband live(a) in contrary to the news about his involve ment in a recent car accident and the different one is that she is saddened by the actualisation of the freedom that she thought she volition have after hearing her husbands loss is completely taken away from her again. Contrasting Representations Suprisingly, the short- theme is written in complete contrasts of the main theme.First of these contrasting representations in spite of appearance the tale is Louises reaction upon hearing the news. The news about her husbands death should bring her agony and tears but instead she sits sedately facing the open window, a comfortable, roomy armchair. Here we see a strange approach to the situation with the word comfortable being use to modify the chair near the window. Louise, a new widow herself, moldiness not see the chair as comfortable as it seems on the button right after hearing the unbearable news of her husbands death. Added to this, the scene outside the window withal symbolizes something in contrast to the storys progression.The spring day from the view outside her window shows a contrasting image to the situation she has. The spring is a symbol of renascence or new life thus the spring prognosticates Louises new life after Brentlys death. Another interesting symbol in the story is the definition of the view laid upon Louises eyes as she sits near the window The delicious breath of rain was in the air. In the street below a peddler was crying his wares. The notes of a contrary song which some one was singing reached her faintly, and viewless sparrows were twittering in the eaves (Brian, 2001).For the readers, the description made by Louise about the view she was seeing clouds what her true emotions were at that moment. It seemed that as she isolated herself in a room, she completely disrega rded the news of her husbands death. These representations had become tricky in contrasting the main theme the story supposes to have or tell. Kate Chopins idea of a Joyful Death Appearance versus Conflict What the readers may discover in reading this story is the possibility that there is an ironic truth behind the death of the main protagonists beloved.In the main gutsdrop of the story where Louis sits in a comfortable chair, she mouth over the words we never expect to read or hear from her. She seems to be halcyon kind of than being sad about Brentlys loss with what the story emphasizes on her shouting free, free, free The freedom she pertains here signifies of her having the will to live a life all by herself, after her husband is gone. As she plays a new-made character referenceistic of a woman, it is a well vie proof that she was indeed after the freedom, of doing what she indigence to do and make decisions for herself.With this fact, the story seems to have a confli ct of its own conflict between the ideas of air and reality. From the moment that the story emphasizes about Louise having her freedom at last, it could suggest the whimsey to the reader(s) that she is not saddened by the news. Unlike what she had shown in the central point of the story, Louise in some way is judge to grieve by the people around her, all having the idea that her marriage with Brently was a happy one.This is what her sister Josephine completely understood with her reaction as she misinterprets Louises behavior and thinking. She hysterically calls out her sister in the room, believing that Louise is heart-broken but in reality, Louise is more(prenominal) lightened up by the news. The doctors purpose about Louises death also deals with this conflict. For them, it seemed that Louise died after realizing that her husband is alive. This fashion of Louises happiness is more illustrated when they predicted that due to heart attack of wallow that kills (Brians, 2001) .Never did they think of the reality that she died because of another reason. That she dies because she was heart-broken to recognize the truth that she will not be able to gain her freedom as what she expected earlier. Role of Woman versus Man Another conflict in the story accentuates the role of woman versus man in the society. It is illustrated in the story that Louise is a submissive wife to Brently. But there is an internal struggle within her that tells that she was not happily married at all.As what Louise thinks, What could love, the unsolved mystery, count for in face of this possession of self-assertion which she suddenly know as the strongest impulse of her being justifies more to the idea that she, indeed, had loved Brently but more were the times she feel not. Maybe for Brently, Louise appeared to be happy with their relationship or he thinks and assumes that she is. Apparently, Louise wanted more the freedom she had felt for in that short while. After finding out the truth that she was not yet all in all free, she had thought that only by death that she would took possession of it at last.thither in death she would find peace and liberty. Ironically, Louise took the realization that her husband was alive and chose to die in able to attain the freedom she longed for. Character analysis Chopin made her characters compliment along with the theme of the story. The main character, Louise plays a youthful wife who tends to have her freedom despite her marriage with Brently. Her youth pronounced up the end of her life and this irony of life, of choosing liberty by death, seemed to be one of the uncertain situations in the matter of choosing life over death.Brently, although his character is not discussed further on in the story, seemed to be playing a role of a husband who wants her wife under his control. Louise would never want liberation if he was a good man to her. His characteristic gives a deeper impact in the story, making Louise choose to die with freedom rather than living with him in a life full of despair. Josephine, Louises sister, was recognized here as a doting sister who takes care of her and all the matters that has a connection with her. Josephine, together with Richards, had taken care of gently recounting to her the death of her husband Brently.She half-concealed the truth, in order for Louise to accept it without suffering her heart problem. Richards, Louises friend, is the one who brought the news to the house, he is responsible for assuring Brentlys death. As he rushes to tell the news to his friend, there is a declarative truth that he was worried about what his friends reaction would be after hearing the news. If he had not rushed over to deliver the news, there is a possibility that Brently could arrive first in the house and justify that his name in the news is a capacious mistake, preventing Louises death and would have lived more.Apart from Brently, Richards is also responsible for the protagonists death. The story gives us the impression that not every death could bring grief to someone. It could be, in another way, a joyful event. Chopin had also brought about the issues of women and their role in the society. The story, written in the nineteenth-century, showed how women years back had no rights to be at their own will. Women then were still under the prying eyes of the society and men dominate over them. Chopin tackles a lot of moral issue within the story.Her story suggests that it would still be better if women of her own time maintain their roles in the society. In the nineteenth-century, men are expected to be superior over women and not the other way around, not what Louise wanted to be. Her insights within the story inspires us with the spate of what harmonious relationships are ought to be and the wide complexity in carriage the contrasting truth between appearance and reality.References Brians, Paul. et al. Reading about the World. (Vol. 2) tertiary Edition. Te xas Harcourt Brace College, 2001.