Media Report

Article Brain food : If it helps gerbils , it could help youOn MSNBC .com s DatelineThe article s authors uncorrupted a find out in which they fed three chemicals (choline , uridine monophosphate (UMP , and docosahexaenoic demigod (DHA ) to gerbils . They overly had a control group . The gerbils that were fed the foods performed miscarry on mazes and other gerbil-specific discussion tests after consuming the supplements for manifold weeksThis study is biased . It has been thought for quite some m that these nutrients , especially DHA , were beneficial . The doctors had a bias - they wanted this curio . They in like manner failed to state the source of the nutrients . It is know that if the nutrients are produced synthetically that they are non as instrumental as by nature occurring nutrients , and synthetic nut rients whitethorn really be harmful . It is incumbent to explain , therefore , how the scientists obtained the nutrients and how multitude may obtain themThe scientists as well used a very short trial result . Four weeks is non a very long m over which to make up intelligence . Studying the effects of these nutrients in the long condition may have yielded several(predicate) resultsNot often information is given in this report . Did the scientists do anything else to the gerbils in the four weeks of the study ? For character , did they spend any cartridge holder training the gerbils to hand the mazes Was the amount of time in the mazes different for the animals on the supplements vs . not on the supplements ? of these questions are addressed . If the gerbils who cleave the supplements were in any case back up in other ways , it may invalidate the results , simply the study results published here bust t say anything around the proceduresDosage information is also not obtainable . It would be ind! ispensable to know how much of each nutrient should be taken , and how , to achieve the results . Of course , the scientists are also assuming that the results open up in gerbils pass on very move to mans , which may or may not be true . It is , heretofore , relatively accepted in the scientific community that these nutrients do benefit humans , so maybe the study was actually uselessFinally , the scientists were unadornedly very biased by personal beliefs single of the study s authors had this to say regarding proposed increased human intelligence with the use of these supplementary nutrients .it s not excessively far a stretch to hope that people s intelligence can also be improved . Quite candidly , this can t ascertain soon enough , as every environmentalist , counsel of evolution and war opponent will attest This scientist is implying that anyone who disagrees with his political sympathies is lacking in intelligence . If his personal biases are that obvious in his critique of the study (which showed simply what he expect and wanted , it is likely that his personal biases also affected the study s outcomesMost scientific research that comes out directly is described minimally , and is done with the `correct answer already in foreland Scientists find themselves accidentally discovering exactly...If you want to get a serious essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper