How would you rule on the case Gratz v. Bollinger?The case Gratz v. Bollinger is a in truth complicated one because it involves two sides that have respectable points charge though one side is supported by the law. For mortal to rule on this case, first has to analyze it in detail. Jennifer Gratz, a white female, resident of Michigan, applied to the University of Michigan in 1995 and was denied admission. In October 1997 she and Patrick Hamacher another white scholarly person who was also denied admission filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court. Both of this students do to assist this university but were denied admissions. Lee Bollinger was the president of Michigan University opus the lawsuit was filed so he spoke on behalf of the university.
The Admissions voice of Michigan University has a policy that every applicant from an under opposeed racial or ethnic minority group, meaning African Americans, congenital Americans or Hispanics are automatic totallyy awarded 20 points of the 100 unavoidable to guarantee admission. This increases the chance for them to be accepted and makes it harder for whites, which have to go with the normal method of admissions. The main reason why this all resulted in such a dispute was because of affirmative action, which in my opinion is an illegal policy.
Gratz and Hamacher alleged the following.
violations and threatened violations of the rights of the plaintiffs and the class they represent to equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment... and for racial contrast (Wikipedia). The Fourteenth Amendment calls for equal rights for all American citizens and the University of Michigan violates this amendment with its undergraduate admissions policy. The university claimed that one of their interests was having a racially and ethnically diverse student body but in my opinion if this...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment