In philosophy, moral relativism is the position that moral or ethical propositions do not reflect absolute or universal truths moreover instead are relative to social, heathenish, historical or personalized references, and that there is no single standard by which to value an ethical propositions truth. Relativistic positions often see moral determine as applicable only within certain cultural boundaries or the context of individual preferences (Moral Relativism). An extreme relativist position magnate suggest that it is meaningless for the moral or ethical judgments or acts of one person or group to be judged by another, though most relativists propound a more hold version of the theory. This essay will discuss various kinds of morality and the people who define them.
What is ethics? The leger ethics is derived from the Greek work ethos, which refers to the character and sentiment of the biotic community and standards of behavior (wikipedia.com). Any group displace set its give ethical standards and then live by them or not. respectable standards, whether established by an individual, a tummy, a profession, or a nation, help guide a persons decisions and actions. The commonly accepted definition of ethics is rules or standards that govern behavior and decision-making.
      Virtue ethics descends from the classical Hellenistic tradition equal by Plato and Aristotle, in which the cultivation of virtuous traits of character is viewed as moralitys primary function. I believe that virtue ethics is a moral philosophy best suited for making blood line decisions. Most theories do not emphasize the agents or actors who put to death actions, have motives, and follow principles. We all make judgments about secure and evil persons whether it is consciously or subconsciously. I think you can tell a lot about a corporation when you look at the people within the company. Aristotle held that virtue...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment