12 Angry Men

12 Angry Men In all guilty cases presented in the courts of the United States, a defendant is presumed innocent until turn up guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The law requires the jury to emission the defendant unless it is fully persuade of the defendants guilt. Many times it whitethorn be difficult for a jury to come to such(prenominal) a significant conclusion. This is clearly evident in the video 12 Angry Men. At first, each juror is convinced of his verdict drop one. Yet of those who are convinced that the boy on trial is guilty, all change their vote except one. A precise example of this would be a resemblance between Juror 3 and Juror 6.

Both jurors hurl heard the homogeneous case and ca-ca studied the same evidence. Yet of the two, Juror 3 does not understand why anyone would consider the defendant not guilty. By taking a closer look at this character one may be able to understand why he seems to have no compassion towards the young boy. At first, Juror 3 appears to be a successful businessman ...If you want to observe a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper