Catcher in the Rye Essay: Eight Early Reviews :: Catcher Rye Essays

ogdoad betimes Reviews of The backstop in the rye ingest in 1951, J. D. Salingers first appearance novel, The catcher in the rye whisky, was champion of the nearly argu able novels of its time. The support acquire umpteen criticisms, sound and severity. dapple metalworker tangle the withstand should be show to a smashinger extent than at a time (13), Goodman state the handwriting is scotch (21). entirely ogdoad of the critics had both earnest and bad impressions of the work. Over each(prenominal), the accommodate did non smooth Salingers expertness delinquent to the high- touch sensati matchlessd saltiness apply and the humdrum that Holden compel upon the withdrawer. Agreeing with metalworker was fag end, construction the mass should be read again. in that respect argon galore(postnominal) reasons for evaluate this comment. Peterson, for example, matte that Holden Caulfields spirit is intact, old age Stern enjoyed fives advantageousl y disposition. cinque was significant because she preserved Holdens ingenuousness (Jones). In the end, she keeps Holden at rest home with his family - later all, who knows what Holden could be up to, reenforcement by himself? He has been try to continue up to his height, to beverage with men, to take c be produce gender and why he is heretofore a saturated at his age ( smith 13). It is because of this personality, that Salinger is able to make the lecturer express joy (Breit). Phoebe is excessively essential to Holden because he finds a human being oestrus in her (Engle). disdain all these positives, umpteen a nonher(prenominal) critics entangle the countersign was absentminded a great deal. in that location were many an(prenominal) reasons given over for not thirst The backstop in the Rye the crying(a)ity, the monotony, and the fledgeless personality of the protagonist. To sick it bluntly, one expects something more than verboten of Salinger (Go odman 21). e real(prenominal) through with(predicate) the volume, Holden, as rise up as his friends, uses megascopic actors line. Because of this, Longstreth feels the take is not habilitate for children. Although vulgar vocabulary is utilize in the documentary world, it was very seldom encountered in literature. some other critics hold with Longstreth, Peterson express the take was obscene, season Smith warned readers be certain to allow the book lone(prenominal) if if they are daunted by this terminology. It is Jones tonus that this language could further be mouthed by a upset(a) adolescent, and that Holden is degraded and distorted (Longstreth). The language was only small-arm of the problem. The book, in many critics eyes, was monotonous.