Population Growth Causes Poverty :: Expository Cause Effect Essays

Everywhere in the world, in every kind of culture, the poorest tribe halt the most children. Does having many children make people poor? Or does be poor make people have many children?That is a glowing question in the continuous struggle over how to spend alien aid money. Those who think state growth causes poverty advocate programs in family supplying and population education. Those who think poverty causes population growth elevate direct economic aid, jobs, capital investment. Take care of development, they say, and the relationship mark will take care of itself.Advocates of both sides have come to the colony of Manupur in the province of Punjab in north India to prove themselves right.There is nil special about Manupur. It is a typical Indian village, with a population in 1950 of about 1200, mostly farmers. Its people are not salutary off, though their lives are slowly improving. New seeds, fertilizers, and credit systems have caused chaff yields to quadruple since 1950.In 1953 a team from the Harvard School of Public health came to Manupur to try out one of the worlds first family planning programs. They visited all homes regularly, took a census, registered all births and deaths. They also instructed people about modern methods of birth check into and handed out free contraceptives.The Harvard team expected that the birth tempo would fall. The Punjabis were rural, poor and uneducated. They had an average of seven children per family. Many young people migrated to the city to find jobs the ones who stayed inherited smaller and smaller plots of land. Surely if families knew how to prevent having so many children, they would have fewer.The people of Manupur politely accepted the contraceptive foams and jellies. At the beginning of the Harvard study their birth rate was about 40 babies per gee people per year. Six years later the birth rate had done for(p) down a little, to 37.7. But the birth rate had also asleep(p) down all over the Punj ab, even where there were no family planning programs.The Harvard researchers concluded that the villagers were not so ignorant after all. Family size had eternally been controlled with crude methods such as abstinence and self-induced abortion. Increasing prosperity caused people to want smaller families, because there was less need for children to work in the fields or support parents in their old age. Once that happened, birth rates went down. Modern contraceptives helped them go down more easily and quickly.