Analysis of Learning Styles and Theories

Analysis of Learning Styles and Theories character APart 1 Who I am as a looker?What is nurture room? concord to H maveny and Mumfords skill appearance questionnaire (1992) learning is seen as a continuous cycle in which a person has a learning look, reviews the experience, concludes from that experience and plans the next step. A persons pickences for one or more of the stages of the learning cycle translate into strengths and weaknesses of learning style.In experiential learning theory, the model of style is ground on a theory of learning. The theory defines four phases in the process of learning from experience concrete experience reflective observation abstract conceptualization and bustling experimentation. single learning styles be defined by a persons cartel on these four learning modes. (Boyatzis and Kolb, 1995)Gagne (1984) says these strategies enable assimilators to choose at attach times the intellectual skills and declarative knowledge they will bring to ca use on learning, remembering, and problem solving.1. VARK launching of VARKThe VARK stands for Visual (V), aural (A), Read/ spell out (R), and Kinesthetic (K). It is a tool for learner to analyze their learning style. According to the Fleming (2009) VARK is a questionnaire that provides users with a profile of their learning drutherss. It is astir(predicate) a learners preferences for pickings in and giving out information in a learning context. The purpose of VARK is to help learner to commemorate nearly their learning style in multiple ways. It suggests some melodic themes for learner to know which learning methods argon suitable for them and how they can learn effectively.However, the limitation of VARK is that questionnaire does non show anything about motivation. It solely contributes to improve learning. Learners only can change their study methods based on their VARK results (Fleming, 2009).My learning style result of VARK is as followsAccording to my VARK result, I si re got nine marks in Aural. Visual, Read/ Write as well as Kinesthetic are all in 7 marks. It shows that I am a multimodal learning style. I can learn from polar learning styles and it implies that I have strong in Aural area.Aural learner learns by listening who identicals to be provided with aural instruction manual. In fact, my result of the VARK is closes match to my own learning style as I often use different learning methods under different situations. For example, I prefer attend group discussions, lecture and tutorial. At school, I uniform to attend the lecture to lectern the teacher to explanation. In the concluding course of instruction project, I enjoy discuss with my group members and explain new idea to some others. Also I follow my group leader instructions to muster up some useful data from the internet for our project.On the other hand, I too as a Visual style learner. Visual learner prefers demonstrations in their learning and can learn through descriptio ns. In my working experience, I work in Wellcome supermarket, my supervisor demonstrated that how to placed the goods on the shelves and told me all products in which area. I can easily get the message and memorize it because of leaving a strong impression in my mind.For the kinaesthetic learner, I prefer experiencing things rather than only read the notes during the learning process. For example, I need to trials on my own when buying a new diligent phone, rather than reading the leaflet of the products.Finally, VARK result can indicate my learning styles. Sometimes I wish well practice actively, sometimes I prefer listening only. Thats why I have multimodal preferences. In fact, I have to pay more attention in different learning styles. VARK is precise useful for helping me to know more about my learning preferences.2. MBTIIntroduction OF MBTIThe Myers-Briggs typecast Indicator (MBTI) was developed by Katherine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myer. It based on the theories of psychologist Carl Jung (Morgan and Barbour, 2008). Hutchinson (1997) shows how personality indicators such as the MBTI can he used in a practical way to understand differences in how large number exonerate and to assist in squad building and communication in a business environment.The MBTI scales invoice a preference for four dimensions (Saggino, Cooper and Kline, 2001)Extraversion-IntroversionWhich represents the point toward the outer world of people and things or the inner world of concepts and ideas.Sensing-IntuitionWhich reflects the individuals preference for factual realistic or global possibilities perception.Thinking-FeelingWhich represents arriving at judgments by achromatic and logical processes or by subjective processes.Judging-PerceptionThe process of coming to a conclusion about something or get aware of something.In combination, the MBTI is a sixteen-type personality profile instrument. (Goby and Lewis, 2000)However, according to Coe (1992), he said that the MBTI has several limitations. First, it does not show any indication about peoples values and motivations. Second, the MBTI does not measure itineraryology. Third, the MBTI does not measure how well the preferred functions are performed.My MBTI result for my natureAccording to my MBTI results, the above result shows that my preferred style of MBTI is ESFJ and ESFP which are 72% and 66 % respectively. It shows the nearly dominant function is extrovert, sensing, as well as whimsy.For the ESFJ, the most classical preferences are Extraverted Feeling. This means I focussing on building harmony in the working environment. I like to build rapport with people and create a positive atmosphere. I look after peoples welfare. Also I like to keep everybody skilful and have a good congenatorship with others. I value other peoples contributions, seek to develop the role that others play, and invest a lot of reason in building positive relationships. I try to overcome differences of opini on and find ways in which people can agree.For the ESFP, the most important preferences are Extraverted Sensing. I bring things to fruition by get things done, and getting them done now. I am very action-oriented, dealing with some(prenominal) t have a bun in the ovens the current situation presents. I often spur others into action as well. I make use of your experience and utilize tools or processes of which I already have knowledge. I try to have an immediate feign on things, injecting a sense of urgency, and aiming to achieve clear goals and tangible results. sales booth on the result, MBTI helps me to understand the personality. I agree that I am an outgoing person. As I have worked as Wellcome Supermarket, I found that building the positive atmosphere can improve the relationship inside the company. I also like to build a good relationship with customers that I enjoy work into a happiness environment. Also I am a vice-president of my secondary schools alumni association. I like to share my study path with others.Besides that I also concern on what group members mental picture rather than my feel and invest a lot of effort in building positive relationships. So I am a feeling person. As a sensing person, when I am doing assignments, I wishing to focus on the facts which help my working process. Also, I like to ask my classmates who had experienced those situations previously in order to make a fall apart decision.Those two personality types (ESFJ and ESFP) are differing in Judging and Perception. This preference is about the process of coming to a conclusion about something or becoming aware of something. I also think the judging is my personality. I like to make a plan and follow the guideline to work within a time limit. When I am doing final year project, I hope myself and my aggroup members follow our plan and to meet the requirement.3. BELBINIntroduction of BELBINThe Belbin team-role memorial is a well-known and established measure for identi fication of individual team roles (Senior and Swailes, 1998). Belbins particular focus on the establishment of roles within a team, where the assumptions of duties and responsibilities depends on a measure of self-discovery combined with a perception of the needs of the team as a whole. Belbin identify 9 team roles in relation to different needs of a group including plant, resource investigator, co-coordinator, shaper, monitor evaluator, team worker, implementer, complete finisher and specialist.My BELBIN result for my Team RoleAccording to my Belbin report, the most preferred roles that I suited are team worker and specialists in which I scored about 80 and 100 respectively.Specialist means people who have the unique(predicate) knowledge and skills to do their tasks. This type of people is warm in providing special knowledge and skills to accomplish the team goals. They will only contribute on only a limited front and brood on specialized personal interest. They only consider th eir own specific area to come out a solution, so they cannot provide a wider perspective. For example, I am interested in computer. I prefer to do something about data analysis and search information from the internet. In final year project, I use my knowledge to analyze the research data and fall flat the conclusion on that part. Also I provide technological support in the presentation.Team worker represents the people who are co-operative, mild, perceptive and diplomatic. They prefer to work with others and usually listen, builds and avert the friction within the team. They are indecisive in crunch situations. For example, I often listen to others instructions in my work. Also I need to cooperate with my colleagues to complete the works.4. compactTo summarize, I believe these tests are quite reliable. According to the test results, I know and understand myself more. I am an extravert person who likes to prate with others and learn from different learning styles. I can cooperat e with others and also concern their feeling. I provide my computer knowledge for people and give some advice for them.Therefore, these tests help me identify myself and let me know how to improve myself. It makes me think more and consider which job is suitable and interesting to me. If I hope to be a leader, I need to learn more different styles and improve my weaknesses. It will be a great benefit to my rising career.ReferencesBoyatzis, R. Kolb, D. (1995) From learning styles to learning skills the executive skills profile, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10(5), pp. 3-17Boyle, G (1995) Myers-Briggs guinea pig Indicator (MBTI) Some Psychometric Limitations, Humanities Social Sciences papers, Bond UniversityBriggs, K. and Myers, I. (2009) wanton Personality Test MMDI website, Available at http//www.teamtechnology.co.uk/mmdi-re/mmdi-re.htm (Accessed 19th November 2009)Coe, C.K., (1992) The MBTI potential uses and misuses in personnel administration, Available at http//www.all business.com/human-resources/343006-1.html (Accessed 19th November 2009)Fleming, N. (2009), FAQ of VARK official website, Available at http//www.vark-learn.com/english/page.asp?p=faq (Accessed 19th November 2009)Goby, V. Lewis, J. (2000) Using Experiential Learning supposition and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Teaching Business conversation, Business Communication Quarterly, 63(3), pp. 39-48.Jackson, C. Lawty-Jones, M. (1996) Explaining the overlap between personality and learning styles, Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 20, pp. 293-300.Lessem, R. Baruch, Y. (2000) Testing the SMT and Belbin Inventory in Top Management Teams, Leadership and face Development Journal, 21(1/2), pp.75-83Morgan, A. Barbour, K. (2008) An initial study into the personality types of undergraduate business students. transactions of the Academy of Educational Leadership, 13(1), pp.33-38Saggino, A. Cooper, C. Kline, P. (2001) A confirmatory factor analysis of the Myers-Briggs Ty pe Indicator, Personality and Individual Differences, 30(1), pp. 3-9.