'Moral Self-Knowledge in Kantian Ethics Essay\r'

'In the article titled, Moral Self- experienceledge in Kantian Ethics, Emer O’Hagan discusses Kant’s views and ideas concerning self-knowledge and the role it plays in duty and virtuous feat. O’Hagan set-back introduces a key feature of Kant’s ethical theory which is its credit of the psycho tenacious complexity of human beings. O’Hagan uses this recognition of psychological complexity by Kant to launch into Kant’s feeling on self-knowledge.\r\n once a basic understanding of Kant’s attitude towards self-knowledge has been established, O’Hagan then uses Kant’s ethical theory to show how self-knowledge piece of ass be used as a means to help determine the virtuousness of an reach. The melodys presented by O’Hagan are logical and happenly supported and verified finished the presented evidence. Kant is sh sustain to have recognized the psychological complexity of the human being in recognizing that, â€Å"ju dgments concerning the worth of actions are vulnerable to corruption from self-interested lean” (O’Hagan 525-537).\r\nKant is saying that that even though an action may start out as from duty, our internal feelings as human beings corporation create a beneficial barricade as a means for the action, therefrom rendering it not from duty. Kant in like manner recognizes that our consume judgments just about us may not be accurate. Moral self-development is a expend to develop accuracy for our self-judgments and takes into consideration unity’s motives for action. O’Hagan tells us that this incorrupt place requires lesson self-knowledge which is a kind of self-awareness disciplined by respect for autonomy, the conjectural foundation of Kantian ethics.\r\nAccording to Kant, the early command of the duties to wizself as a moral being is self-knowledge. This is the ability to know yourself in terms of whether your heart is for good or evil and whet her your actions are pure or impure. Kant describes duties of virtue to be wide duties, in that there is not a clear standard for how champion(a) should go about performing action for an end that is also a duty. O’Hagan tells us that Kant’s duty of moral self-knowledge is the duty to know one’s own heart.\r\nKant tells us that moral self-knowledge is quite difficult because it involves abstracting, or taking a non-biased analysis of one’s self. Because we are bound to our own feelings and inclinations, we cannot completely separate ourselves from our own bias. The index number of self-knowledge is the power to see things in objectiveness instead of subjectivity. The final step of the argument is relating self-knowledge to determining the goodness of an action. O’Hagan tells us that developing self-knowledge will develop one’s self-understanding and will develop guards against self-deception.\r\n apply these skills to truly understand one ’s heart allows for one to know one’s motives, and thus practical berth in action. According to Kant, the goodness of an action is determined by one’s motives, so the goodness of one’s action can now be evaluated. O’Hagan clearly demonstrates the vastness of self-knowledge in Kant’s theory of ethics and validates its importance by describing application for use of the practice of self-knowledge (O’Hagan 525-537).\r\n'